thepeopleseason (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
thepeopleseason) wrote2004-06-26 12:22 am
thepeopleseason) wrote2004-06-26 12:22 am
Entry tags:
Dear S.B. Woo:
Today, you sent me the following "news" under the subject "Lots of GREAT News":
Or it would be if you didn't obtain your mailing list addresses using known spammer tactics. Since I've received e-mail from you going to <myusername> at both my yahoo and hotmail accounts, plus to addresses which I last used in 1993 for posting to Usenet, I figure that threefold increase in addresses on your list are a result of either the unethical spammer practice of culling addresses from archives or the purchase of an unscrupulously-obtained list.
Either way, it means I'll nary give the 80-20 Initiative a single penny until you rebuild your address list so that it comprises only the addresses of people who actually would care to be on it.
In the meantime, I suggest you give a swift kick in the nads to your unresponsive system administrator.
3) 1.1 million e-mail addresses on 80-20's list. It is a factor of 3 increase over the 300,000 email addresses in the 2000 election.Wow. That's pretty impressive.
Or it would be if you didn't obtain your mailing list addresses using known spammer tactics. Since I've received e-mail from you going to <myusername> at both my yahoo and hotmail accounts, plus to addresses which I last used in 1993 for posting to Usenet, I figure that threefold increase in addresses on your list are a result of either the unethical spammer practice of culling addresses from archives or the purchase of an unscrupulously-obtained list.
Either way, it means I'll nary give the 80-20 Initiative a single penny until you rebuild your address list so that it comprises only the addresses of people who actually would care to be on it.
In the meantime, I suggest you give a swift kick in the nads to your unresponsive system administrator.